Preferentum
Since 2015
Russia
Central Federal District of the Russian Federation
Moscow
115280, st. Leninskaya Sloboda, d. 19, p. 6
Top managers:
Romanov Dmitry Aleksandrovich
Owners:
SL Soft - 20%
Dmitry Aleksandrovich Romanov - 7%
Sashin Gennady Gennadievich - 45%; Konstantin Igorevich Kuznetsov - 22%; Tsibulsky Valentin Vasilievich - 6%.
(April 2023)
Content |
Preferentum offers state and commercial organizations modern intelligent technologies for analyzing arrays and streams of unstructured information: NPA projects, contracts, citizens' requests, corporate e-mail.
The company's products are designed to help avoid gaps and conflicts in regulatory legal documents, facilitate contractual work, allow more efficient use of employee knowledge, and make existing information systems more intelligent.
History
2023: Acquisition of controlling interest by Softline
Softline Group of Companies, a provider of solutions and services in the field of digital transformation and information security, acquired three manufacturers of corporate business applications (including Preferentum) and the rights to relevant software products from Applan Group of Companies. This was announced on April 20, 2023 to TAdviser by representatives of Softline. The amount of the transaction was not disclosed. Read more here.
2021: Owners
Owners of the company as of July 2021:
- ATI - 20%
- Igor Rodomirovich Kasimov - 15%
- Yapparov Tagir Galeevich - 15%
2020: Performance indicators
2020 LLC "Preferentum" completed the year with revenue of 21.6 million rubles. (+ 37%) and a profit of 4.3 million rubles.
2017
As of November 2017, Preferentum emphasized three basic products/technologies:
- Selecting Named Entities (Information Objects)
- Machine Learning-Based Classification
- Validate documents using custom lexical templates and rules
2015: Founding of the Company
The Preferentum company was created within the framework of the ATI Group of Companies in 2015. Its name comes from the expression Contra Preferentum (Latin - against the proposer) - the principle of law, according to which ambiguous formulations in the contract are interpreted by the court against the one who proposed them.