Dynamic systems of DS-bank

History

2020: A prison term to heads of bank and the Central Bank for plunder of 585 million rubles

At the end of April, 2020 the court pronounced verdicts on two former employees of Head department of the Bank of Russia across Central Federal District on Alexey Batrakov and Dmitry Kapriyelov and also two bank ex-presidents "The dynamic systems" (DS-bank) of Igor Sinyukhin, Fyodor Tsyrulnik and their accomplices. They were accused of plunder of 585 million rubles.

The court sentenced participants of the criminal scheme for the terms from 4 to 7 years. The owner of bank  Ildar Klebleev  went to prison for 8 years and 6 months. They are found guilty according to Part 4 of Article 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("The plunder using official position committed by organized group in especially large size"). 

Ex-employees of the bank of Russia are sent to prison for plunder of 585 million rubles

According to the investigation, defendants in the case from August, 2015 to April, 2016 withdrew money from DS-bank, signing dummy loan agreements with the organizations under control of them and people.

Malefactors charged-off money of insurance company where they worked with salaried employees, under the guise of providing loans to the organizations, dividend payout, security purchase and the real estate and also transfer of bills of exchange for benefit of the third parties.

The scheme was opened only after a response at bank of the license in May, 2016 because of a lack of means on accounts, the false reporting and "high-risk credit policy". 

The adviser to the chairman of the board Victor Averin and the head of department of crediting Alexander Vdovin who also participated in the criminal scheme signed with the prosecutor pre-trial agreements about cooperation in this connection concerning them criminal cases were selected in separate production. Under weight of collected incontestable proofs Klebleev, Sinyukhin, Tsyrulnik and Kapriyelov admitted guilt in deeds, reported in Investigative Committee.

The court satisfied the civil action submitted by bank, almost in full, having collected in its advantage the real estate, cars and money on bank accounts of defendants.^[1]

Notes