RSS
Логотип
Баннер в шапке 1
Баннер в шапке 2

Kazakova Victoria Borisovna

Person

Content

Kazakova Victoria Borisovna
Kazakova Victoria Borisovna

Biography

2023: Sentence - 3 years suspended for embezzlement of insurance company property

In October 2023, the Zyuzinsky District Court of Moscow sentenced the former director of Spassky Gate-M Victoria Kazakova to three years in prison conditionally in the case of embezzlement of the property of an insurance company. This was reported in the press service of the Deposit Insurance Agency (DIA). They also noted that the civil claim of the DIA in the interests of the insurance company was fully satisfied in the amount of 7.4 million rubles.

The DIA filed a lawsuit with the Moscow Arbitration Court against the following ex-leaders of Spassky Gate-M:

  • Victoria Kazakova,
  • Vladimir Kazakov,
  • Mikhail Korolyov,
  • Boris Hait,
  • Olga Kochetova,
  • Valeria Likhova,
  • Galina Bekina.

According to the state corporation, these top managers transferred the company's funds in favor of third parties, wrote out "groundless bonuses" to employees, and also paid for services that were not there. Sources News"" report that CENTRAL BANK it was misled due to inaccurate data on the availability of funds in the accounts of "Spassky Gate-M" banks VTB in and "." Intesa In addition, in order to hide the lack of assets in the reports, the assignments of real estate objects were allegedly deliberately changed.

The agency recalls that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation revoked the license from Spassky Gate-M in connection with the violation of the requirements established by the Bank of Russia of the list of assets allowed for investment and the procedure for investing the insurer's own funds. The court declared the Spassky Gate-M Insurance Group bankrupt. In the process, the DIA revealed that "the heads of the insurance organization unreasonably transferred funds in favor of third parties, issued groundless bonuses to employees, and also paid for the services of third parties without counter-provision," the court decision explains.[1]

Notes