Consolidation of participants of the market of housing

Today in Russia active conversions in the field of ZhKK are need. Speed of making changes in regulating documents is proved by the huge sizes of our country and other factors inherent in features of development of our state. For example, reform of housing and public utilities was initiated in 1997 but the necessary conversions planned for the planned period were not implemented. And by 2004 society became another, there were proprietary purposes set by the legislation of the rule appeared at the crossroads: by universal global parameters reform was late at least for about 10 years. Respectively, the legal framework for reform of housing and public utilities lags behind the consumer long ago.

Let's consider market mechanisms of implementation of legal methods of management of houses.

Usually if the house has no owner, then all emergency situations will regulate local bodies. For the state or municipal entities such method of management will be more expensive, than the others.

At management company the house has the temporary administration. As a result over time the managing director will be engaged only in generation of profit, as a rule, with indifference having treated a problem of search of funds for major repairs, on renovations after several years. For local officials such method of management will be profitable only as an opportunity "row" money as bodies of housing supervision and heads of the management housing companies will be periodically interchanged the position on a mutually advantageous basis. And as a result, the state should solve the postponed monumental task again — search of the host and the help to it huge injections in an overhaul.

Such method of management of apartment houses (further MCD) is only transfer of insignificant difficulties on management companies — in several years to penetrate into already aggravated problems again. But desperate situations do not happen also in our case, perhaps, just it makes sense to organize transfer of houses to management to the decent companies not automatically and with big warranty providing (as bank guarantees to investors), here then, most likely, the number of persons interested to receive houses in management (money of inhabitants) will sharply be reduced. But the end in itself not to get rid of some participants of the market of housing, and on the contrary to integrate them for implementation of the global purposes in housing and public utilities.

Participants of the market of housing

Let's try to characterize the relation to reforms of each of participants of the market of housing and public utilities and whenever possible their relationship.

State, federal level. At the initiative of leaders of the country of conversion are begun with change of the legislation. A problem of the state — to set the direction, but not to be a nurse and the eternal ward. Therefore at today's stage the state should become the main lever in correction of the set direction. The purpose of the state for today — strictly to ask and impose ban on raider behavior in the market, to give to the people the real chance to consciously select to itself a method of management of houses.

State, regional level. Due to the encouragement of the federal center with money for an overhaul the regional authorities began to participate more willingly in establishment of new orders and more carefully to treat origin of national independence. In Moscow at the end of 2007 more than one hundred thousands of rubles are selected for each house for creation of condominium. If to consider that in Moscow the trend of creation of quarter condominiums from group of houses is supported, then the condominiums of firm promoting creation receive one million rubles for one legal entity, at the same time with vote results as most labor-consuming stage of work, it is possible to argue. Meanwhile activists of houses even, most likely for a half of such money would make condominium legal without defects, three times faster. It is worth thinking …

Municipal entities. Earlier local administrations were founders and owners MUPOV through which there passed budget money for service of networks and houses. And now it was ordered to local government authorities to leave such experience. As money for reform there is no place to take, and money for housing and public utilities is articles of local budgets of paramount importance, simpler it appears to change nothing.

Exclusive management companies. Behind the name "management companies" of course, stand people who know a lot of things about worn-out networks and about liquidations of accidents and so forth. But the same as it is impossible to put for a steering wheel of the reactive airplane of the most experienced and honored pilot of "agriculturial aeroplane", in precisely the same way, it is impossible to throw from pro-slavish ZhEK on a post of the director of management company of anything understanding in management and economy of the person. Really we need such directors?

The management companies selected on tender by owners. There are a few such fair management companies (MC) which meet requirements of organized inhabitants owners. The permanent leader of the house is necessary for such companies. But also he will not work for free. Even if the management company will pay something to him (as in many cases in reality and occurs), the leader of the house all the same will fully not be able to control works as it will be connected by compromises with the director: itself asked this organization to take the house, gets paid, and did not provide profitability.

Partnerships of owners. As envisioned by authors of changes of the Housing code such form should become the most widespread. At the Duma listenings of the bill was considered that houses which will not take in hand condominium there will be a minority, and their control will be transferred to management companies. The main priorities of the law were assigned to partnerships, and all the rest remained in words active legislators.

They can as directly organize the economic services, and to sign contract agreements with the servicing and operating organizations. Condominiums are mobile also sotsialna. They are non-profit organizations and bear public function — to be an intermediary between owners and contractors of housekeeping tasks of houses. They are deprived of a task to work for profit earning, they are owners of real estate.

Inhabitants owners. A part of inhabitants has the property rights to premises. They possess the rights to a common property in a proportion with square meters of housing. Now owners make a little more than 50% of inhabitants. The cities, municipal entities, the private organizations and the Russian Federation own the rest of housing. Respectively, gradually inhabitants on hands have a prevailing vote block at problem solving of management of the house and works of condominium. However inhabitants owners it is possible to divide into two categories: active owners — 5%, the hidden owners — 50%. This part of owners never participates in vote. The state on behalf of city departments by the voices in total from 5% of active inhabitants gains the majority.

Inhabitants employers. Generally would be fair and logical to integrate all inhabitants of the house (both owners, and employers) in one intra house community. However the law decided to separate them. As a result owners of premises live life: hold general meetings, are engaged in the maintenance of a common property, create condominium or select management companies, lands near the house deal with issues, and inhabitants employers only pay for housing, maintenance and repair and for the rendered utilities. Thus, about 80% real (if to consider on the heads) residents are not puzzled with either obligations for the maintenance of the house, or the rights to the choice of color of an entrance or quality of its cleaning.

Public associations of inhabitants. For the purpose of involvement of inhabitants to common interests on improvement of maintenance of houses and house adjoining territories the law on public associations of citizens gives them the chance without distinction of the property rights or contractual relations with owners jointly to participate in social job at the place of residence through Bodies of public amateur performance (further OOS). Such associations can not be registered in general anywhere, actually to them to anything — business activities they do not conduct the status of the legal entity. OOS can play the positive role both before creation of condominium, and in already created partnerships. They give a legal opportunity to everyone from among 80% of citizens not of owners to declare the opinion and to offer the help.

Purposes and methods of consolidation of participants of the market of housing

For further creation of the productive relations in questions of management of the house we will consider the professional possibilities of our social and active neighbors. Socially and economically active neighbors are grouped in five main professional kinds of activity. Respectively, and it is necessary to integrate the housing market from small, i.e. from consolidation by a common goal of residents.

Entrepreneurs, directors. The business, aktivkny people who are in search, with positive entrepreneurial and economic approach, with skill, opponents of "court jabber" and vanity, people of a reality.

Lawyers, workers of a law-enforcement system. The specialists with long-term experience seeing a distance behind clouds, who are not confused colourful appeals and declarations, guided in all basic legal processes of the country.

Managers, heads of the organizations. The professionals of a broad outlook ready to concentrate around itself the solid teams of adherents ready to offer the assistance and to other partners if only case did not stand, and their work was demanded, not single.

Public figures, leaders of labor unions. The careful and opened to innovations people, benevolent and capable to reason the position, options of improvements able to organize group of neighbors for a good cause, showing the example.

The social activists at the place of residence who joined in processes of local and housing government. The people motors uneasy from the decency, but not from resourcefulness, so friendly that they can be read out companions from the first conversation. The main thing — not shy and penetrative.

Having decided on the main social groups of supporters, we will try to define the purposes which can integrate five professional groups the interests of one house (quarter):

• increase in liquidity and capitalization of the house;
• improvement of living conditions and comfort;
• house adjoining improvement;
• development of infrastructure of the house;
• uninterrupted operation of operation of the house.

Why consolidation of participants of housing and public utilities is necessary?

There are no specialists in ensuring our comfortable stay, today, actually. Indulge "in vain hopes" and make itself dependent not really that and it would be desirable. So, all of us are interested in two trends:

• by what methods and techniques it is possible to take housing in hand and under the control;
• as in this economic practice to implement itself with the greatest return.

Each of us separately — the competent specialist. But it is necessary for us in the shortest possible time from deprived of civil rights and passive consumers to be transformed to Jacks of all trades! And this problem is absolutely unsolvable when everyone begins to pull a blanket on itself(himself).

But together to representatives of five different professional groups these questions do not seem senseless and unrealizable any more. Here long-awaited output: let's integrate! Working and household experience of everyone.

Let in our command the director will be the director (the general manager). The manager will be the organizer of technologies, external and internal schemes of interaction, will ensure the economic sovereignty and safety. The trade-union leader will work with the personnel, personnel, to advocate also their interests. The social activist will head board and will be delegated to local authorities. And the lawyer let protects a common property, observes laws and if it is necessary, resolves our disputes.

Consolidation methods

It is possible to provide consolidation of all participants of the market of housing by means of local consolidation of interested persons (social and active residents) in each house. The set of houses in which the order will reign in management will make healthy community. What will contribute to the development of the relations in conversion old and to construction of a new system of housing and public utilities. But how we can implement assigned tasks on consolidation?

It is possible to achieve the goal laborious work of managers, for example the chairman of condominium who in turn initiates and coordinates work of condominium, provides transparency of work of a partnership, generally, to establish cooperation of residents and regulatory authority.

Such interaction, and afterwards and consolidation of residents is possible if accounting of activity of UK, condominium and other organizations of the sphere of utility and housing services becomes absolutely transparent for all participants. Thanks to transparency, the trust among consumers of housing and communal services will significantly increase, and the service layer will qualitatively change.

Achievement of this purpose is promoted by use of modern instruments of the automated accounting at the enterprises of housing sector. Experience of implementations of the industry 1C:VDGB program can be an example of successful use of information technologies for control automation of housing and public utilities : Accounting in management companies of housing and public Utilities, Condominium and HCC.

The program ground under specifics of housing and public utilities provides the solution of a set of tasks: since accounting of owners of property, drawing up the cost estimate and finishing with accounting of votes and results of votes, the house cost accounting, etc.

The innovative technologies help to build the work qualitatively and professionally. For example, the management company or condominium has an opportunity to use Internet technologies for management of housing and public utilities of houses — to create the website allowing residents to trace online information on meter readings, to leave requests to abnormal and dispatching service, and the most important — to see how allocated funds are spent. Functionality of the 1C:VDGB program: Accounting in management companies of housing and public Utilities, Condominium and HCC provides ability to integrate with the Websites for housing and public utilities and joint work with standard programs of a 1C system: Enterprise. To the specialist it is possible to solve in a complex with her help all necessary problems of organizations of the sphere of utility and housing services — from ZhEKs and DEZOV to management companies and condominium.

Practical application of new solutions in the field of management of housing and communal services (in particular, automation of housing and public utilities), will increase quantity of available opportunities, will cut down temporary and resource expenses of housing and public utilities Management Companies (condominium, HCC) that, finally, will lead to creation of long-term and trusted relationships with consumers and regulatory authorities. And as a result, promotes housing market consolidation in general.

Salamatina M., 1C:VDGB company