Key technologies in the world market of HRM systems
As experts note, in all modern world-class HRM/HCM systems are implemented functionality of the "user" and "operational" level (including "information self-service", support of the staff list, personnel, time keeping, payroll, surcharges and assignments). The key directions of technology development of HRM systems is automation of hiring, management of "talents" and efficiency of personnel and also training management of employees now. Besides, for HRM solutions the SaaS model based on Web services is very perspective.
You look the directory of HRM systems and projects at TAdviser.
Functions of the modern HRM systems
According to materials of Forrester Research, the modern integrated HRM systems contain six main functional units distributed on three technology levels unevenly. This structure can be provided as follows.
"User" level
Блок «информационного самообслуживания»
Self-service interaction layer | |||
The interface for personnel
Employee self-service | The interface for managers
Manager self-service | Means of exchanging messages
Employee communications | Means of the managerial analysis and generation of the reporting
Management reporting and analysis |
"Strategic" level
Блок управления процессом обучения
Learning management processes | ||
Управление треннингами
Training administration | Управление содержанием курсов
Learning content management | Проведение треннингов Learning delivery |
Блок управления процессом найма
Recruitment processes | ||||
Поиск и привлечение кандидатов Candidate sourcing | «Ведение» претендентов
Applicant tracking | Адаптация вновь нанятого персонала
New-hire onboarding | Управление назначениями
Contingent staffing |
Блок управления эффективностью и «талантами»
Performance and talent management processes | ||||
Управление эффективностью персонала
Employee performance | Управление кадровым резервом
Succession planning | Управление компетенциями
Competency management | Управление компенсациями и премиями
Compensation and rewards | Планирование и анализ
Planning and analysis |
"Operational" level
Блок учета труда
Workforce management processes | ||
Учет рабочего времени и прогулов
Time and attendance | Планирование и прогнозирование
Forecasting and scheduling | Управление командировками, отгулами и отпусками
Absence management |
Блок учета кадровых операций
Transactional HRMS processes | ||||
Кадровый учет и делопроизводство
Employee records and personnel actions | Управление поощрениями
Benefits administration | Расчетный контур
Payroll | Управление должностями/ штатное расписание
Position management | Правовое обеспечение
HR compliance |
As noted, now "operational" and "user" levels are worked well out practically in all solutions presented at the world market. The main technology development is observed at the "strategic" level which is implemented both suppliers of complete solutions of HCM/HRM, and developers of specialized solutions. At the same time technology leaders are not always financial market leaders at all.
Technology leaders
During preparation of the report "The Forrester Wave™: Human Resource Management Systems, Q3 2006" analysts of the company selected 10 vendors operating in the world and American market of HRM systems (Automatic Data Processing (ADP), Ceridian, Employease, Infor, Kronos, Lawson, Oracle, Sage, SAP and Ultimate Software). At the same time to guarantee a maturity of the selected companies and their serious positions in the market, the following three criteria were used:
- The vendors included in the report should have not less than 400 companies clients, and the operated products should process in total accounts, at least, of 500.000 employees.
- Products of all companies included in the report should support the minimum set of functional units, including personnel records, management of compensations and encouragement, a settlement circuit and "information self-service".
- Products of the companies included in the report should support requirements of the legislation of the USA to HRM systems.
As for solutions for multinational companies which can ensure global functioning of a uniform HRM system, only four companies which entered the report can provide them: SAP, Oracle, Infor Global Solutions and Lawson. According to estimates of Forrester Research, technology leaders are SAP (mySAP ERP HCM) and Oracle (Oracle PeolpeSoft Enterprise, Oracle E-Business Suite) here that is not something surprising, and Infor Global Solutions and Lawson are carried to "strong players". At the same time, the cumulative "technology" point of mySAP ERP HCM made 4.28, Oracle PeolpeSoft Enterprise – 4.19, Oracle E-Business Suite – 3.90, Lawson Human Capital Management Suite – 3.29, and Infor Human Capital Management – 3.27.
Technology level of HRM solutions for multinational companies
Source: Forrester Research, 2006
A bit different situation developed at assessment of the domestic American market (with the removed requirement of support of multinational companies). Here leaders are Lawson and Ultimate Software. Nevertheless other vendors were included into group of "strong players". Estimates of technology level of their products were located as follows: ADP Enterprise HR – 4.01, Ultimate UltiPro Workforce Management – 3.99, Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise – 3.92, Ceridian HR/Payroll Web – 3.89, mySAP ERP HCM – 3.88, Oracle E-Business Suite – 3.63, Kronos Workforce Central HR/Payroll – 3.62, Lawson Human Capital Management Suite – 3.60, Infor Human Capital Management – 3.38, Employease Network – 3.15 and Sage Abra HRMS – 3.12.
Technology level of HRM solutions for the American companies *
Source: Forrester Research, 2006
- The diagram considers not only the level of technologies, but also two other factors
American realities
Estimating today's American market of HRM solutions, analysts note three of its key features:
- dominance of SaaS solutions over the traditional "installed" products: the market leader, Ultimate Software changed the business model to SaaS several years ago, ADP and Ceridian build on it a considerable part of the business, and Employease initially worked in the SaaS model;
- simpler and available products are on sale more successfully: Sage Abra, a product with a high ratio "price/quality", is very popular with the American companies with number of staff to 1.000 people, also SaaS solutions are popular, and implementations at medium-sized enterprises of "heavy" ERP systems are rare because of high cost and complexity;
- lack of "weak" products: in the market, except leaders, only "strong players" are provided; the main difference between solutions consists in the level of sale of blocks of automation of hiring, accounting of work and working time, performance management of personnel and its training.
Sereda S.A.//TAdviser
By the beginning of the overview