Mirnyi Nikolay Grigoryevich

Mirnyi Nikolay Grigoryevich

Biography

2023: Term for theft of 13 million rubles during the construction of a health center

In June 2023, the Tushinsky District Court of Moscow sentenced Nikolai Mirny, former general director of Trust Moselektrotyagstroy JSC, to three years of suspended imprisonment in a fraud case during the construction of a fitness center in the Pushkin district of the Moscow region.

As Kommersant"" writes with reference to court materials, the criminal case against Nikolai Mirny was opened by the ICR Administration in the Moscow Region on March 15, 2019 under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud on an especially large scale). The reason for this was the statement of the leadership of the Pushkin municipal, formations who considered that during the construction of the "fitness center with a swimming pool" the district budget suffered material damage. According to the court, we are talking about embezzlement of 13 million. rubles

The ex-head of Trust Moselektrotyagstroy JSC pleaded not guilty. According to his lawyer Irina Chekasina, in 2014, at the height of the construction of a health center, "force majeure circumstances" occurred. In particular, according to her, against the background of the imposition of sanctions, the dollar rose sharply, which is why the cost of imported equipment and components for it has significantly increased. This circumstance led to an increase in the cost of construction. In addition, under these conditions, suppliers switched to prepayment terms, and delivery times increased significantly. All this, the lawyer told the court, led to the fact that appropriate adjustments were made to the project documentation.

In addition, according to the version of protection, the replacement of equipment during construction was agreed with both the customer and the designer, and it fully complies with the design documentation. In addition, the lawyer Chekasin pointed out, in 2017, the state Mosoblexpertiza gave a positive opinion on these changes, confirming the validity of exceeding the value of the concluded municipal contract by 40 million rubles.^[1]

Notes