Content |
Biography
2021: Imprisonment for bribery
On February 18, 2021, the Central District Court of Barnaul sentenced three former employees of the Altai Regional Oncology Clinic in the case of bribery and misappropriation. According to investigators, they received money from suppliers for concluding contracts with them for the supply of goods for the needs of the clinic.
According to the regional department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation (TFR), Olga Nevar, ex-deputy head physician for economic affairs, former chief nurse Zhanna Chichkanova and ex-head of the contract service of the medical institution Rigina Mull, were appointed terms from eight years and two months in prison to eight and a half years. After the verdict, all three were taken into custody in the courtroom.
The investigation and the court found that these employees of the oncological dispensary in the period from 2015 to 2017 received bribes from suppliers of medical products in various parts for assistance in the field of public procurement for the needs of a medical institution. The amount of bribes amounted to more than 20 million rubles. rubles In addition, during the investigation of the criminal case, the investigator revealed the fact of embezzlement and misappropriation of funds by the deputy chief physician in the amount of about 1 million rubles, which went to the dispensary as payment for medical services.
Nevara was detained during the direct transfer and receipt of a bribe in the amount of 144.5 thousand rubles. Investigators opened a criminal case against the deputy head physician under Part 6 of Art. 290 of the Criminal Code (receiving a bribe on an especially large scale), and the general director of the supplier company became a defendant in the case under Part 5 of Art. 291 of the Criminal Code (giving a bribe on an especially large scale).
During the preliminary and judicial investigation, the doctors did not admit their guilt. The volume of the criminal case amounted to 90 volumes and about 500 hours of audio and video recordings, which, according to investigators, is due to the production of a large number of procedural and investigative actions, as well as "proving the guilt of the defendants who took active conspiracy measures in carrying out criminal activities."[1]