RSS
Логотип
Баннер в шапке 1
Баннер в шапке 2

Content

Warsaw Vadim Evgenyevich
Warsaw Vadim Evgenyevich

Biography

2018: Detention in a fraud case

Vadim Warsaw was detained in March 2018. According to investigators, Petrokommerts Bank issued a loan to the Zlatoust Metallurgical Plant, whose owner was Warsaw. The company undertook to fully pay off the debt by March 2018. According to the prosecution, after receiving these funds, they were sent to the Chelyabinsk company Metallurg Trust, and from there - in two tranches to the Cypriot Masterking Trading Limited, which distributed the money among other offshore companies. The former State Duma deputy denied guilt in fraud.

2019-2020: 3.5 years in prison for non-payment of taxes

In December 2019, the Leninsky District Court in the Rostov Region found Vadim Varshavsky guilty of evading taxes as the general director of the Rostov Electrometallurgical Plant. According to investigators, from 2014 to 2015, Warsaw included false information in the tax declaration, which allowed the company to "save" more than 497 million rubles in income taxes. The court sentenced him to 3.5 years in prison with a sentence in a maximum security penal colony.

In 2020, the Lefortovo Court of Moscow collected from Warsaw in a lawsuit by Trust Bank in the amount of more than 8 billion rubles of loan debt.

2021:7 years in prison for embezzlement of 2.5 billion rubles from Petrokommerts Bank

In September 2021, the Zamoskvoretsky court of Moscow sentenced Vadim Varshavsky to seven years in prison with a sentence in a general regime colony for embezzlement of 2.5 billion rubles from Petrokommerts Bank. The ex-State Duma deputy from United Russia was found guilty of committing a crime under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code (fraud), writes RBC with reference to the press service of the court.

In addition to imprisonment, the court recovered more than 2.6 billion rubles from Warsaw. The prosecution asked for 8.5 years in prison for him, insisting on finding the defendant guilty of especially large-scale fraud. Prosecutors referred to the testimony of the injured bankers and the data of the financial examination of the transaction.[1]

Notes