2025
The leaders of the digitalization of the regions will be evaluated according to the new methodology. Deputy Prime Minister Grigorenko told TAdviser her details
Since 2025, the methodology for calculating the rating of regional leaders of digital transformation (RCT) has been changing. Priority criteria for the new RCT rating at the end of February were presented by the Deputy Prime Minister - Head of the Government Apparatus Dmitry Grigorenko at a meeting with regional leaders of the digital transformation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. And in early March, Dmitry Grigorenko shared with TAdviser details about the new criteria.
According to Dmitry Grigorenko, the methodology will be simplified by categorizing priority indicators. At the meeting, 7 groups of criteria were proposed for use, 5 of which are tied to the national development goals of the Russian Federation:
- life situations/public services (the provision of mass socially significant services in electronic form and in proactive mode, refactoring, transfer of services to electronic form is assessed);
- trusted AI (introduction of services and solutions with AI);
- domestic solutions - import substitution (the technological independence of software and hardware in AWS, complete replacement of foreign software are assessed);
- information security (increasing the level of security of information systems, connecting to a unified platform for combating fraud);
- digital maturity of the department's support processes (development and use of regional systems that meet uniform requirements, or federal services to support working communications, personnel management and electronic document management).
The remaining two key figure groups are related to regional authorizations:
- infrastructure/Internet (creating conditions for providing socially significant facilities with telecommunication infrastructure and access to Wi-Fi);
- regional support measures (provision of support measures, preferential IT mortgages, school education).
 | The system for evaluating the IT work of regions is correlated with the implementation of digital transformation programs and their results. We chose priority areas, grouped them and simplified them as much as possible. It turned out the rating criteria with an understandable calculation method, - explained Dmitry Grigorenko. |  |
The rating will take into account the share of requests for mass socially significant services, both through the unified portal "Public services" and through regional portals for the provision of state and municipal services, as well as the use of a feedback platform, a mobile electronic signature "State Key." Services with AI (the introduction of trusted AI) have been of particular importance in the ranking since 2025. In addition, import substitution requirements (providing jobs with domestic operating systems) will increase for the regions.
The information security plan will continue to take into account the work on the protection of the departmental and regional circuit of information systems. In the indicators of digital maturity of the processes of ensuring the activities of the department, the emphasis will be placed on electronic document management and regional services for working with personnel.
In a grouped form, the key figures look like this:
1. Life situations and public services:
1.1. Share of requests for receipt of MSZU in electronic form using EPGU and/or RPGU
1.2. Improving the quality of public services at EPGU
1.3. Implementation of feedback platform
1.4. Introduction of mobile electronic signature technologies ("State Key")
2. Services with artificial intelligence:
2.1. Share of implemented scenarios for using trusted AI services based on regional systems or federal solutions
2.2. Share of industries that use trusted AI solutions
3. Domestic solutions (import substitution):
3.1. Transition to domestic solutions in standard activity software
3.2. Transition to domestic solutions in software used in state and departmental information systems
3.3. Ensuring the use of modern domestic information protection tools
4. Information Security:
4.1. Advanced training of employees of the structural subdivision of the authority performing the functions of information security
4.2. Connection to State system of detection, prevention and elimination of consequences of computer attacks
4.3. Independent analysis ("bug bounty," pen tests)
5. Digital maturity of the processes of ensuring the activities of the department:
5.1. Share of employees of organizations and departments using regional (relevant) or federal services to support working communications (VKS, mail, messenger)
5.2. Share of employees of organizations and departments using regional (relevant) or federal services for EDM
5.3. Share of employees of organizations and departments using regional (relevant) or federal services for human resources
6. Infrastructure, Internet access:
6.1. Share of regional and municipal NWOs with broadband Internet access in accordance with the requirements of
6.2. Share of schools buildings and organizations in which wireless Wi-Fi networks are created
7. IT Support Measures
7.1. The share of recipients of preferential IT mortgages, for which additional rate subsidies are also provided at the expense of the regional budget
7.2. Share of small enterprises in the IT sector applying regional tax incentives under the STS
7.3. Share of data centers applying regional reduced rates of property tax, land tax, as well as rent (under lease agreements for state and municipal property)
7.4. The share of schoolchildren in grades 5-11 studying computer science at an in-depth level
The proposed rating indicators along with the calculation method after the meeting were sent to the regions. Until March 10, the regions will be able to send feedback in response, and then, if necessary, adjustments will be made. And already in April it is planned to conduct the first measurement in terms of rating indicators. Checkpoints during the year will help to make adjustments to programs on time.
Recall that earlier, according to the instructions of the president, strategies for the digital transformation of all regions were created, which operated from 2022 to 2024. Upon completion, the government interviewed the regions what changes should be made to the standard forms and, taking into account feedback, revised the requirements for programs.
New requirements for the formation of programs have already been sent to the regions. The Deputy Prime Minister suggested that the leaders of the digital transformation work in dialogue and actively engage in work: send their comments and proposals to the government again. After the feedback is received, by the end of March the government plans to approve the form, and by April 30 to receive developed programs from the regions.
Rating of Russian regions by digital transformation presented
At the end of February 2025, the Center for Expertise and Coordination of Informatization (CECI), subordinate to the Ministry of Digital Ministry of Digital Development of the Russian Federation, published a rating of regional leaders of digital transformation (RCT). The work of 88 regions (except Moscow) was analyzed, of which 39 scored more than 70% of the maximum possible assessment. The rating was presented at a meeting with regional leaders of the digital transformation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation with Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Grigorenko.
A total of 18 indicators are taken into account when forming the rating. These include information security, the transition to GosTech, the level of import independence of software, the digital maturity of government bodies, preferential IT mortgages, the completeness of entering information into GIS housing and communal services, the digitalization of services through a visual designer, the level of satisfaction of citizens with mass socially significant services, the introduction of a feedback platform, state tablets, the share of electronic medical birth certificates, the introduction of "State Lyucha," sending executive documents in electronic form, etc. At the end of 2024, the Top 10 Russian regions for digital transformation included:
- Belgorod region - 94.22%;
- Republic of Tatarstan - 91.35%;
- Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug - 90.79%;
- Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra - 90.12%;
- Chelyabinsk region - 88.26%;
- Sverdlovsk region - 87.25%;
- Moscow region - 86.63%;
- Novosibirsk region - 84.71%;
- Orenburg region - 83.95%;
- Sakhalin region - 82.87%.
Kamchatka Territory (plus 31 positions), Smolensk Region (plus 28), Kabardino-Balkar Republic (plus 22), Yaroslavl Region (plus 21) and Arkhangelsk Region (plus 18) demonstrated the greatest positive dynamics compared to the previous rating. A significant decrease was recorded in the Republic of Bashkortostan (minus 17 positions), the Rostov region (minus 15), as well as the Samara and Vologda regions (minus 13 positions each).[1]
2021
Minek issued a rating of regions in terms of the quality of provision of electronic public services
In June 2022, the Ministry of Economic Development presented the results of monitoring the quality of electronic services in Russian regions. In the course of the study, experts analyzed 408 of the most demanded socially significant services provided by the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local governments on the Unified Portal of gosuslugi.ru and regional portals of state and municipal services.
When compiling the rating, various parameters were assessed that affect the quality of receiving an electronic service, for example, the availability of complete information on the procedure for providing it, the convenience of submitting an application, the ability to track its status in your personal account and reduce the number of face-to-face visits to departments.
Moscow became the leader in the quality of provision of state and municipal services in electronic form (95.84 points at the end of 2021). The capital topped the rating compiled by the Ministry of Economic Development for the third year in a row, said Deputy Mayor Natalya Sergunina. The second and third places were taken by the Moscow and Tula regions with results of 84.19 and 83.67 points, respectively.
| | Monitoring stimulates the regions to constantly improve the quality of the provision of state and municipal services, says State Secretary - Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Alexei Khersontsev. - A peculiarity of monitoring in 2021 was its conduct on a limited and previously unknown list of services for the regions, which, in our opinion, increased its objectivity, equalizing the possibilities of its participants. The task is to achieve a fully proactive nature of the provision of the service. So that the convenience of interaction with the state corresponds to the level of popular banking applications and electronic trading platforms.[2] | |
Rating of Russian regions for Internet work
At the end of November 2021, it became known about the rating of regions for working on the Internet, which was compiled by the Dialogue ANO. Experts assessed all subjects of the Russian Federation, except for Moscow, the Moscow region and Chechnya, according to five parameters:
- speed and quality of feedback in the "Incident Management" system;
- development of information threats;
- infrastructure (working with official and unofficial publics, personal accounts of heads of regions);
- information campaigns;
- activities of the Regional Management Center (SDG).
The Kaluga region (86 points) is the leader in terms of indicators, followed by Tatarstan and the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug (84 points each), Kemerovo and Tyumen regions (83 points each) close the top three. In fourth place were the Magadan Region and Kalmykia (82 points each). Next are the Nenets and Chukotka Autonomous Okrugs, Sevastopol, Tula Region (81 points each).
Less than 70 points were scored and ended up in the "red zone" Voronezh, Murmansk, Penza, Sakhalin, Chelyabinsk, Yaroslavl, Volgograd, Kurgan, Sverdlovsk, Smolensk, Ivanovo, Novosibirsk, Ryazan, Kaliningrad, Vladimir and Tver regions, Ingushetia, North Ossetia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Bashkiria, Mari El, Karelia, Krasnodar and Khabarovsk Territories. Experts did not assess Moscow, Moscow region and Chechnya.
The head of the Petersburg Politics Foundation, Mikhail Vinogradov, believes that such a rating demonstrates the integration of governors into the KPI system for working with social networks, which is set by the Kremlin, and is an element of building a common language with federal curators.
| | And then it all depends on the style of work of the governors: someone believes that social networks and the Internet are very important and the faster you react to people's appeals, the higher the manageability and assessment of your work, he said.[3] | |
2019: Region Ranking for End-to-End Digital Technology Development
In October 2021, the Institute for Statistical Research and Knowledge Economics (ISIEZ) of the Higher School of Economics published a rating of the involvement of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the development of "end-to-end" digital technologies (SCT), which include neurotechnology and artificial intelligence, distributed registry systems, quantum and new production technologies, robotics and sensory components, wireless communications and virtual and augmented reality technologies (VR and AR).
The place in the ranking was determined by the total contribution of the region to the total flow of submitted applications for inventions related to all SCTs. The capital accounted for 40.6% of domestic patent applications for SCT (11.3 thousand in 2010-2019). The strongest positions Moscow were taken in the development of distributed registry systems (75.4% of all domestic patent applications for inventions filed Russia in this SCT over the past decade), virtual and augmented reality (54.9%), neurotechnology and (artificial intelligence 54.6%), wireless communication (53.6%).
The contribution of the other two leading regions to the flow of domestic patent applications for SCT inventions is somewhat more modest - 8.6% (2.4 thousand) in St. Petersburg and 5.8% (1.6 thousand) in the Moscow region. The sphere of their most noticeable influence is also more limited: both regions demonstrate high performance in the field of patenting robotics and sensorics technologies, and developers from St. Petersburg have succeeded in the field of virtual and augmented reality.
According to the results of the rating, the regions were divided into four groups. In the first - "national leaders" (leading positions in almost all SCTs), these are the top 3 regions. Moscow in it occupies the strongest positions in four of the seven technology groups. The second group is regions specializing in individual SCT groups (Voronezh, Nizhny Novgorod, Novosibirsk, Samara, Saratov and Sverdlovsk regions, Tatarstan and Bashkortostan, Krasnoyarsk and Perm Territories).
The third group includes regions that successfully develop non-specialized neurotechnologies and artificial intelligence, VR and AR technologies and distributed registry systems. These are the Oryol and Rostov regions and the Krasnodar Territory, where the ratings of applicants in the field of SCT are headed by universities. The fourth group is the most numerous. These are 69 regions lagging behind in terms of patent activity in all areas of SCT. In total, they account for only a fifth of all patent applications.[4]
2017: Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications: Rating of regions on the development of the information society
The Ministry of Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation presented in October a rating of regions for the development of the information society for 2017.
Ugra ranks third in this rating, behind Moscow and the Tyumen region. The top ten also includes the Republic of Tatarstan, the Tula Region, the Novosibirsk Region, the Republic of Bashkortostan, the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, the Tomsk Region and the Chelyabinsk Region.
To determine the leaders, the assessment method was used for 120 indicators and 17 sub-indices. When calculating the location, the level of development of special information systems is taken into account: GIS "Contingent," IE of the Transport Management, EGAIS, GIS GMP, System-112 and GIS "Energy efficiency."
Among the priority sub-indices: ICT infrastructure, e-government, ICT in education, ICT in health care, ICT in transport. The list of sub-indices corresponds to the sections of the Concept for the Development of Regional Informatization.
The assessment of the regions took into account the development of such projects as the transfer of public services to electronic form, the introduction of information systems for distance education, the introduction of ICT in the educational process (electronic diary), an appointment with a doctor, an electronic card, telemedicine, the introduction of electronic means of payment for travel, online traffic monitoring. Also, the success of the regions in the ranking guaranteed the creation of regional information systems in the field of power, state and municipal finance; integration of regional information systems with federal ones and automation of libraries, museums and theaters.
2013: State Management: Level of e-government implementation
According to the rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation by the level of implementation of Electronic Government as of February 1, 2013, the State Management publication [5], at the beginning of the year the leaders in the implementation of e-government services were: in the Central Federal District - Moscow, Lipetsk and Belgorod regions, in the Northwestern Federal District - St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk and Novgorod Regions, Southern Federal District - Rostov, Astrakhan Regions and Krasnodar Territory, in the North Caucasus Federal District - KBR, Dagestan and Stavropol Territory, in the Volga Federal District - Nizhny Novgorod and Samara regions, as well as Tatarstan, in the Ural Federal District - Tyumen and Sverdlovsk regions, in the Siberian Federal District - Trans-Baikal, Krasnoyarsk Territory, in the Far Eastern Federal District - EAO, Khabarovsk Territory, Yakutia.
State Management, February 2013
See also: Full version of the rating
2012: State Management: Level of e-government implementation
Rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation by the level of implementation of Electronic Government as of April 1, 2012, published by the publication "GosManagement," indicates that the level of development of electronic services is leading in the Central Federal District - Moscow, Lipetsk region and Belgorod region, in the Southern Federal District - Krasnodar Territory, Rostov and Volgograd regions, in the North Caucasus Federal District - KBR, Stavropol Territory and Dagestan, in the Volga Federal District - Nizhny Novgorod Region, Tatarstan and Samara Region, in the Ural Federal District - Tyumen region, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, in the Siberian Federal District - Omsk Oblast, Trans-Baikal Territory, Tomsk Oblast, in the Far Eastern Federal District - EAO, Sakhalin Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai.
2011
IRIO: Regional Readiness Index for the Information Society
"Digital inequality" of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, which is described in detail in the annual reports of the Institute for the Development of the Information Society (Institute for the Development of the Information Society (IRIO)). In fact, this means that due to historical, economic, geographical, managerial and other reasons, the level of penetration of certain high technologies from region to region is seriously different.
Regional Information Society Readiness Index
Institute for Information Society Development, IRIO
View rating in full
The most complete reflection of the situation with regional informatization in the Russian Federation is presented in the Index of Readiness of the Regions of Russia for the Information Society, which has been published by the IRIO since 2005. The index is a measure of how prepared regions are for large-scale use of ICT for socio-economic development. It is calculated on the basis of indicators characterizing the development factors of the information society (human capital, economic environment and ICT infrastructure), as well as the use of ICT in six areas (public and municipal administration, education, health, business, culture, households).
According to the latest Index, based on data for 2009-2010, information inequality among the subjects of the Russian Federation is still quite serious. The top ten regions with the maximum number of points included Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Tomsk Region, Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug, Tyumen Region, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Murmansk Region, Chuvashia and the Republic of Karelia. At the same time, at the very end of the index list are such regions as, for example, the Kursk region, the Tambov region, Kalmykia, Tuva, Dagestan, Ingushetia and others.
"Digital inequality" in numbers
Institute for Information Society Development, IRIO, 2011
The goals of the new state program "Information Society," among other things, are to reduce the digital inequality of the regions, the development of e-government services and the further development of the ICT market.
NAIRIT: Innovative activity of the regions
According to the 2011 Regional Innovation Activity Rating, prepared by the National Association for Innovation and Information Technology Development (NAIRIT, Moscow has once again become the leader in innovation activity. For the first time, compared to previous studies, the gap between the capital and its closest pursuers in the rating began to decline to 15%. The second place was taken by the Republic of Tatarstan (last year 4th place in the ranking). The region has the largest special economic zone in Russia, 4 industrial parks, technopolis, 14 technology parks, and so on.
Innovation Activity Rating Summary Table
NAIRIT, 2011
The highest growth rates of innovative activity in 2011 were demonstrated by the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, which was able to rise by 25 positions in the ranking at once. Elements of innovative infrastructure are actively being created in the region. Funding for scientific and innovative areas has increased significantly. The region has significant innovation potential. Also, a high increase in activity in the innovation sphere (by 10 positions) was noted in the Kemerovo and Belgorod regions.
The main "losers" of the rating should include the Moscow region (a drop in the rating by 27 positions), the Kamchatka Territory (a drop in the rating by 12 positions) and the Voronezh region (11 positions). In general, approximately 9% of its participants managed to maintain their positions in the ranking. About 42% of the regions increased their activity. 49%, on the contrary, showed results lower than last year. At the same time, the number of regions in the category "Low innovative activity" remained unchanged compared to last year. The number of regions in the category "High innovative activity" increased by only one participant. As a result, the total indicator of innovation activity for 2011 turned out to be almost the same level (1.5% higher) as the same indicator for 2010.
Notes
- ↑ Almost half of the Russian regions entered the top rating of the RCT for 2024
- ↑ predstavilo itogi observoringa kachestva elektronnyh uslug v regionah rf.html The Ministry of Economic Development presented the results of monitoring the quality of electronic services in the regions of the Russian Federation
- ↑ Experts assessed the effectiveness of the work of local authorities on the Internet
- ↑ Involvement of regions in the development of digital technologies
- ↑ http://gosman.ru/? news=29388
| The site content is translated by machine translation software powered by PROMT. The machine-translated articles are not always perfect and may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. Read original article If you find inaccuracies or errors in the results of machine translation, please write to editor@tadviser.ru. We will make every effort to correct them as soon as possible. |